Tuesday, March 3, 2009

BIOGAS INDUSTRY BULLETIN






BIOGAS INDUSTRY BULLETIN
Issue #1, March 2009

Farming Clean Energy Conference: The San Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization (SJVCEO) http://www.sjvcleanenergy.org hosted the Farming Clean Energy Conference on November 5th, 2008, at the Southern California Edison’s AgTAC facility in Tulare. The Bioenergy Working Group participated during the plenary session on 11/5/08 and a breakout session on 11/6/08. To see copies of the working group’s Power Point presentations, as well as other conference presentations, please visit:
http://www.sjvcleanenergy.org/document-library
Purpose of the Biogas Working Group Bulletin: To disseminate information that is relevant to the development of the biogas industry in the San Joaquin Valley region.
_________________________________________________________________________
New State Government Funding Opportunities: The California Energy Commission released the Renewable Energy Secure Communities (RESCO) program solicitation. In addition to renewable energy integration solution projects, the solicitation is funding dairy biogas or bio-power technology characterization, assessment and validation projects as well as demonstration of low emission technologies for conversion of biomass fuels such as biogas. Proposals are due February 27th. Please visit:
http://energy.ca.gov/contracts/pier.html#renewable
_________________________________________________________________________
New Federal Government Funding Opportunities: On January 16, 2009, the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) announced the availability of funding for Conservation Innovation Grants (CIG). Funds for single- or multi-year projects, not to exceed three years, will be awarded through a nationwide competitive grants process with applications accepted from all eligible non-federal government or non-government organizations or individuals. CIG enables NRCS to work with other public and private entities to accelerate technology transfer and adoption of promising technologies and approaches to address pressing natural resource concerns. Examples of target areas for this year's funding that are applicable to anaerobic digestion include:
Improved On-Farm Energy Efficiency (e.g., biobased energy opportunities; methane recovery)
Water Resources (e.g., innovative animal manure management systems)

Funding for CIG is made available through the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP). All proposed CIG projects must involve EQIP-eligible producers. CIG is not a research program, but rather a tool to stimulate the adoption of conservation approaches or technologies that have been studied sufficiently to indicate a high likelihood of success. CIG will fund projects targeting innovative on-the-ground conservation, including pilot projects and field demonstrations. Technologies and approaches that are commonly used in the geographic area covered by the application, and which are eligible for funding through EQIP, are not eligible for funding through CIG. The federal contribution for a single project cannot exceed $2 million. At least 50 percent of the total cost of the project must come from non-federal matching funds (cash and in-kind contributions) provided by the grantee. Applications must be received in the NRCS National Headquarters by close of business March 2, 2009. The complete Announcement of Program Funding is available at:
http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/cig

_________________________________________________________________________
Demonstration Projects: Two heavy-duty diesel powered milk trucks converted to run on methane gas were showcased at the Dairy Pavilion, World Ag Expo, International Agri-Center, Tulare, 1:30 PM, on February 11. For further information, contact Carolyn Brown, 510-813-5521,
carolyn@GreenWaveStrategies.com

_________________________________________________________________________
Local Government Efforts: Kern County Board of Supervisors approved on January 27, 2009 a resolution to exempt biogas pipelines less than eight miles in length from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
_________________________________________________________________________
Federal Legislation: A bipartisan group of U.S. senators introduced legislation January 22, 2009 to promote the development of biogas. Under the Biogas Production Incentive Act of 2009, producers would receive a tax credit of $4.27 for every million British thermal units of produced biogas.

“Farmers Optimistic About Biogas Bill”
By Leora Broydo Vestel

The street value of manure could rise sharply if a new bill introduced by Senator Ben Nelson, Democrat of Nebraska, gets the green light from Congress. The Biogas Production Incentive Act of 2009 would provide tax credits for transforming livestock waste into a renewable form of natural gas.

Under the proposed legislation, producers would be eligible for $4.27 per million B.T.U.s of biogas produced annually for a ten-year period. Running the numbers for a 1,000-cow dairy farm which produces 40.32 million B.T.U.s of biogas per day — the average output for a facility that size, according the Environmental Protection
Agency’s AgSTAR program, the tax credit would be about $63,000 annually. “Natural gas prices today are $5.00 to $6.00 per million B.T.U.s wholesale. At those kinds of prices there isn’t any motivation for dairymen to get into this business,” said David Albers, owner of Vintage Dairy in Riverdale, California, and president of BioEnergy Solutions, which installs and operates biogas systems and then shares revenues from the sale of the gas with the farmer. The tax credit, Mr. Albers said, “is a way to level the playing field so they can attract different sources of capital.”

The bill is virtually a carbon copy of legislation introduced in 2008 and 2007, both of which died in committee. Proponents feel the current political climate — with the focus on renewable energy as a means to invigorate the economy while reducing reliance of fossil fuels — is just right. “An idea like this suddenly has a lot more cache,
” said Jake Thompson, a spokesman for Senator Nelson. Mr. Thompson noted his office is lobbying the Senate Finance Committee to incorporate the legislation into the stimulus proposal, which in draft form, provides nearly $25 billion in tax incentives to producers of renewable energy.

Experts say such fiscal enticements from the federal government are needed for biogas to become a commercially-viable alternative to natural gas. As of 2008, there were 121 biogas recovery systems in the United States generating about 256,000 megawatt hours of power, according to AgSTAR. But the agency found that biogas systems are technically feasible at about 7,000 existing dairy and swine operations, with a potential of producing up to 6 million
megawatt hours of energy annually (PDF). “Existing incentives for biogas have been very week compared to other
renewables,” observed Brent Gloy, an associate professor at Cornell University’s Department of Applied Economics and Management. Mr. Gloy said the proposed legislation was “a real step in the right direction that could really get the industry going.”
_________________________________________________________________________

Federal Programs:
The AgSTAR Program, a partnership between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the U.S. Department of Energy, encourages the use of methane recovery (biogas) technologies. Please visit:
http://www.epa.gov/agstar/

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

The Power of Manure


Check out this MSNBC video clip featuring a Central Valley Dairy: Joseph Gallo Farms in Atwater, CA. A tour of this dairy will be conducted on June 5th at 10am.

Thursday, April 3, 2008

Farming Clean Energy: A Conference to Grow Clean Energy Capacity in the San Joaquin Valley



The Farming Clean Energy Conference is designed to catalyze the adoption of clean energy
within the agricultural sector California’s San Joaquin Valley. The primary focus of this
conference will target farmers and agri-business owners and the practical actions that they can
take to develop successful clean energy projects. The conference will encourage participants to
share experiences with their peers, the financial community, technology vendors and regulators.

This two-day conference is scheduled for fall 2008.

Rationale and Significance Production of renewable energy is emerging as an industry with major potential for rural economic development in California, benefiting the region’s wealth of farms and agribusinesses, in addition to helping the region address its air quality and growth challenges. The agricultural sector has the potential to become a leading clean energy producer as well as a major beneficiary of clean energy production—however, clean energy resources still face numerous obstacles to commercialization. This conference will focus on economic revitalization of the San Joaquin Valley and highlight opportunities and obstacles to implementation of on-farm energy projects including: wind and solar power, biodiesel and biogas\biomethane production. This conference would not be a stand-alone, one-time event. Instead, it will be the first of similar events designed as a means of organizing key agricultural sector partners in the region around clean energy and shaping the support areas for the nascent San Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization (SJVCEO.) As a follow-up to the conference, SJVCEO staff will provide information and assistance to support development of promising clean energy projects and partnerships, in addition to addressing barriers to clean energy development in the region.

Approach and Focus Areas

  • Potential conference topic areas include:
  • Selling Power to the Grid (including power purchase agreements and net metering)
  • Regulatory permitting challenges (including key air and water permitting and the
    potential for permit coordination)
  • Developing Valley-based alternative fuel market opportunities (including market opportunities from Assembly Bill 1007 to develop clean fuels in the Valley)
  • The financing and ownership structure of renewable energy installations/facilities
    (including farming co-ops, strategies for attracting public and private sector capital, and
    avenues for funding small- to medium-scale renewable energy projects)
  • The impact of global warming and related agriculture production opportunities
    (including carbon credit programs, no-till cropping & specialized feedstock production)
  • Project scale issues and how to overcome them
  • Market opportunities to leverage and impediments to address
  • Federal, state, and local programs and policy leadership
Who Should Attend?
Farmers, agri-business owners, leaders from agricultural groups, rural development
organizations, utilities, private business, research facilities and clean energy advocates who share a common vision for a sustainable agricultural sector for the San Joaquin Valley.

Roadmap to a Sustainable Biogas Industry in the SJ Valley

San Joaquin Valley Clean Energy Organization
Development of a Sustainable Biogas Industry in the SJ Valley
RoadMap

Background:
  • Assess the geographic availability, quantities and cost to handle the organic resource
  • Examine possible business models to cost-effectively transform organic resource to energy
  • Calculate potential energy production in therms, MW’s or gallons of fuel, account for air pollution benefits and green house gas emission reductions
  • Describe the purpose of this document

State of Affairs:

  • Describe the current rate of development for the target industry, i.e., how many units are installed? how many permits are in process? what are investors concerns and uncertainties?
  • Identify path to investing in biogas production facilities, from design, financing, permitting, installation and commissioning, as well as utility contractual agreements
  • Survey current efforts being undertaken at the state (Cal EPA, ARB, CDFA, CEC) and federal (US EPA, USDA, DOE) agency level, regional and local organizational efforts to advance the biogas industry in California.

Regulatory and Institutional Barriers:

  • Describe the issues pertaining environmental laws and regulations that make the investment path more expensive and time consuming. Describe same impact created by utilities, IOW’s.
  • Use in-the-grown testimonials from farmers and their consultants to highlight levels of frustration with the process, lost opportunities and cancellation of potential projects.
  • How many projects have not being build because the permit process is onerous?
  • How many more projects would be built if utility contract options were more equitable and further compensated owner of resource to make investment more profitable?
  • Identify path to overcoming these barriers.

Drivers to Overcome Barriers:

  • Identify regulations, energy policy objectives and economic market forces driving or that can be used to drive the development of the biogas industry
  • Rank the drives by level of importance, timeliness, relevance to the regulatory agencies and utility companies, as well as to the dairy farmer and investment partners.
  • Assess potential to activate drivers by legislation, collaborative efforts within regulatory agencies as well as progressive utility purchasing power policies and rates to stimulate investment.

Conclusions and recommendations:

  • Summarize state-of-affairs with positive and negative developments; identify two or three recommendations that can have positive impacts and are within the scope of the SJVCEO.